They contains four affairs: self-confident proper care thinking (“Worrying assists us to avoid dilemmas down the road”), opinions from the uncontrollability and you can issues (“My alarming is hazardous for me”), cognitive proficiency (“We have nothing trust in my memories having terminology and you will labels”), standard bad viewpoints (“If i didn’t manage a troubling think, and it just happened, it would be my fault”), and you can intellectual worry about-understanding (“I do believe much regarding the my view”). Brand new metacognition questionnaire try scored during the a cuatro part size out-of step one (“don’t agree”) to help you cuatro (“concur considerably”) and had an excellent Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The brand new metacognition questionnaire has been utilized generally when you look at the non-clinical samples including smokers and you may youngsters [49, 45]. An entire score try computed in order to create a collection away from metacognition for every single fellow member.
The new Obsessive-Fanatical Collection is a great 42-item worry about-report survey, assessing the severity of some obsessions and you will compulsions away from OCD for the adults . The fresh obsessive-obsessive directory contains 7 subscales that include washing (“We clean my personal hand more frequently otherwise longer than needed”), checking (“I go returning to cities so You will find not harm people”), doubt (“Though I really do something carefully I believe that it isn’t some correct”), ordering (“I have disturb when the others have altered how i has actually set-up my personal anything”), obsessing (“I find challenging to handle my personal opinion”), hoarding (“We assemble anything I do not need”), and you will neutralising (“I believe I need to repeat particular numbers”). So it directory are obtained to your a 4 part Likert scale, from just one (“not at all”) in order to 4 (“extremely”) together with a great Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A whole get are computed to form one to get for each and every fellow member about O-C periods.
Procedure
The opportunity sample of college students took part in the research. Users have been to begin with served with information about the research and you can provided the chance to ask questions about it. Shortly after giving concur, for every single new member given demographic advice, following were served with this new five forms inside a counterbalanced buy to answer during the their particular go out. In the event that new member finished he/she try thanked and debriefed. The material and procedures then followed brand new ethical direction and functions intricate by the American Psychological Organization and you will were seemed and you can accepted of the College or university out of Hertfordshire ethics committee (Number:14149216).
Results
Research is processed to own shed beliefs, outliers and you can presumptions off mathematical data prior to people investigation . Every parameters had appropriate opinions to possess skewness and kurtosis without significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of your countless all computed spiders found confident and you may significant relationships between them (Dining table 1). The best connection is actually amongst the indexes off county and feature nervousness, followed by the association ranging from nervousness sensitiveness, metacognition and you will O-C symptoms.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In 
order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.